This would be inexplicable outside Canada.
Almost any part of suburban Toronto brings a sameness of houses. Many neighbourhoods were built as a block, in the same year, in the same style. In order to encourage solid and financially-sound building design, the government agency Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (initially Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation; but always CMHC) sponsored house design competitions and paid architects a royalty for use of their designs in return for making the plans available inexpensively to all.
(I should note that that “available … to all” came with a fairly heavy dose of colonialism. As with credit to Francophone Canadians in the 19th century, mortgage finance was denied to First Nations people in Canada until very recently. Just part of the conciliation we have to do before there’s a hope of useful reconciliation.)
So many suburban neighbourhoods come straight out of the CMHC catalogues. CMHC houses are featured in Douglas Coupland’s Souvenir of Canada. They’re not part of the the whole “majestic” Canada thing, but they are as Canadian as _____.
I came across a tweet the other day about the CMHC catalogues:
I went to the site and there were loads of catalogues there, all languishing unbrowsably in boring old FTP folders. So I decided to put up all the CMHC Small House designs that I could find on archive.org. Here’s a sampler from each of the decades that are available:
So many houses. So many neighbourhoods. So many families. So many stories.
These are all of the CMHC design catalogues that I put up on Internet Archive:
- 67 Homes for Canadians (1947)
- Small House Designs: Bungalows (1949)
- Small House Designs: 1½-storey (1949)
- Small House Designs: 2-storey (1949)
- Small House Designs: Bungalows (1950)
- Small House Designs: 1½-storey (1950)
- Small House Designs: 2-storey (1950)
- Modèles de Maisons: Région de Québec (1950)
- West Coast House Designs (c.1950)
- Small House Designs: Bungalows (1952)
- Small House Designs: 1½-storey (1952)
- Small House Designs: 2-storey (1952)
- DND Small House Designs (1954)
- Small House Designs: Bungalows and split-level houses (1954)
- Small House Designs: Two-storey and 1½ storey houses (1954)
- Modèles de Maisons: Région de Québec (1954)
- Small House Designs (1957)
- Modèles de Petites Maisons (1957)
- Small House Designs (1958)
- Small House Designs – Supplement (1958)
- Modèles de Petites Maisons (1958)
- Modèles de Petites Maisons – Supplément (1958)
- Small House Designs (1962)
- Small House Designs (1965)
- Small House Designs Supplement (1965)
- Modèles de Petites Maisons (1965)
- House Designs / Modèles de Maisons (1968)
- House Designs / Modèles de Maisons (1968; Supplement 1)
- House Designs / Modèles de Maisons (1968; Supplement 2)
- House Designs / Modèles de Maisons (1971)
- House Designs / Modèles de Maisons (1972)
- House Designs / Modèles de Maisons (1974)
- A Selection of Small House Designs (1976)
- Modest House Designs 1977
- Modest House Designs 1977 (Metric edition)
They’re all downloaded from CMHC’s FTP site (ftp://ftp.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/chic-ccdh/HousePlans/). A dedicated urban architecture archivist could have a field day there.
CMHC link via Elie Bourget – thanks!
We’ve just had an election in Canada. You probably didn’t know.
The (now) majority Liberal Party of Canada ran a set of 106 issues pages, and their stance on each. Visitors could vote on how they felt on these issues. The overall results aren’t tabulated there yet, so I took the liberty of scraping the data (harder than it looked) and ranked it.
Here are the top ten issues from the website, ranked by popularity:
- Electoral reform
- International students and temporary residents
- Middle class tax cut
- Helping families
- Ending unfair tax breaks
- Canada Post
- Science and scientists
- Post-secondary education
I have no idea how objective this information is. I suspect some attempts were made to game the system, looking at the vote counts for the top two.
Here’s the data: liberaldotca-realchange-poll-data-2015-10-20-183923. All the columns after Five Stars were derived by me.
I’m very disappointed that the issue of Missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls wasn’t even in the top twenty. C’mon Canada; for once, don’t let me down.
*: english-speaking Canadians who visited» Real Change and voted on issues there before 2015-10-20 18:39:23 EDT, that is.
It’s the Canadian Electricity Association’s Electricity in Ontario week. Can’t you feel it in the air? A brochure, snappily titled “ELECTRICITY ARE WE GETTING VALUE FOR THE MONEY WE PAY?” [pdf] was in my dead tree media stack this morning. I think it’s trying to say our power is too cheap, as in this graph yoinked from the text:
But as ever, hand-picked statistics only tell half the story. Digging into the IEA Key World Energy Statistics handbooks for 2011 and 2012, the data look something more like this:
2010 Domestic Electricity Price / USD/kWh
2010 Annual Electricity Consumption per capita / kWh
Annual Cost per capita
So really, because Canadians use such an obscene amount of energy per capita (srsly; we should be ashamed of ourselves), the graph should look more like this:
So we’re not actually that inexpensive; solidly mid-range. Since our electricity price per kWh is so low, if we spent a little money on energy conservation, we could have really cheap power for everyone.
ICQuestionBank2csv: A tool to extract both the Basic and Advanced Amateur Radio Examination guides from Industry Canada’s rather annoying two-column PDFs. Written for IC’s 2014-02 database updates.
Written by Stewart C. Russell (aka scruss) / VA3PID – 2014-03-07.
- Perl, with Text::CSV_XS
- xpdf tools
advanced2csv.sh to download the source PDF and extract the data.
Made using scruss/taflmunge and QGIS.
— Organic Canadian wheat on red cedar, beeswax encaustic; 72 × 182 mm.
In the Synthetic History of Canada, there was no symbol more evocative of hearth and home than the wheat board. Reconstructed here by the artist in the traditional materials of cedar [strength], wheat [abundance] and beeswax [cohesion], the wheat board is a forgotten part of Canadian lore. Its rediscovery as a domestic art form brings new hope of a progressive national identity.
A decade ago today, Catherine and I landed in our adopted home. There was snow on the ground. Late in the day, we checked into the Holiday Inn at Martin Grove and Dixon. We hadn’t brought clothes for snow.
The next day we went to stay at the meeting house. The day after I braved slush and the Warden bus for a job interview at Warden and Alden in Markham. There were still farms at Warden and Steeles.
Until we moved in here in late June, we house sat, couch-surfed, whatever you want to call it. We relied so much upon the kindness of then-strangers. So thank you to: Don and all the Bowyers, Jane Orion, Brett & Nancy, Lynn & Tam, Brydon & René; to Les for the first job at Gandalf, to Dave and the TREC crew for being there at the start of a new industry.
I didn’t blog back then, kept no journal, and took few photographs. The first few years were tough — early 2003 might be a special low point, with a bitter winter, a dreadful job and a flooded basement. Every tiny detail of the immigration process seemed so important at the time, but now barely registers. Getting a SIN card up on St Clair? Biggest deal ever, then.
So, thanks to everyone, here’s home now. I think it was the right move.
Poor nuclear power just can’t catch a break. The Canadian Nuclear Association commissioned a cross-Canada attitude survey, and — well, I guess people like nuclear power slightly more than coal, but worse than everything else. Which sucks to be nuclear, I suppose.
A pile of candy-coloured snow on a hot day in June is no surprise to many Canadians. The photo location may help those outside the country, though it helps to know what a “community recreation centre” is.
What with the sad loss of Wild East Compact Sounds this summer, my sources of music are now limited. eMusic, bless ’em, have been my source of indie stuff since about 2003. They were cheap, had a fixed price per download, and carried a raft of indie stuff and no major label tat.
Not much longer; got this in my inbox:
So, yeah, the full announcement: major label content, minimum 49¢/track, and variable pricing. Exactly all the reasons I wouldn’t want to use them. Good call, eMusic, for a battered-about subscriber since 2003.
I was initially confused by the pricing. I pay 36¢/track, so I couldn’t see how their promise that “your monthly payments will not change and you will still be able to download the same number of tracks available today, if not more, depending upon your current plan“. Then I see their new menu:
So basically they’re crediting me with a fake $4.48 a month (oh wait; “30 days”, not a month; they so want you to forget to download stuff by making the cycle date change) so I can still get my 35 downloads. Since they hint that there will now be variable pricing, I’ll bet the new stuff will be >49¢, so I really won’t be able to download as many per month after all.
They’re saying that the new pricing will allow them to do a bunch of fun stuff:
We’re also committed to making eMusic a better member experience. We recently rolled out improvements to Browse and Search pages. And we’re hard at work on a host of new features and enhancements including a music locker, which should allow you to stream your music collection from any desktop or mobile device. In addition, improvements to eMusic’s social features, to better connect you with our editors, other members, artists, labels and your friends, are also in the works. We’ve sketched out an ambitious slate, and it will take a little while to get there. We hope you’ll continue on the journey with us.
I don’t want all that social fluff. The MP3s work just fine on any mobile device, so streaming them just adds more crud. I want fixed price downloads, not some half-assed music locker. Where, oh where is Frank Hecker and swindleeeee when you need them?
A little bit of silliness for Thanksgiving:
This took almost no time to put together. The “speaker” is a Tim Hortons cup with a cheap piezo glued to the base. What makes the Arduino sing is the Tone Library running its RTTTL demo sketch, with the anthem itself pasted in from a rather old Nokia Ringtones library.
Update: Here’s the code, such as it is. It’s just the Tone/examples/RTTTL code with the tune data pasted in. I’d been programming Arduino for about a year, so that was a semi-major achievement for me:
It’s nice to revisit old code and find it was written by a friend, Brett Hagman of Rogue Robotics.
Dr. Friendly Rich knows my name.
So, Netflix Canada launched today. As a (fairly) loyal Zip.ca subscriber, I was worried, but to be honest, I can do without putting DVDs in the mail every week. Since we can watch Netflix on the Wii, I thought I’d sign up for a trial month.
|1||A Single Man||✓||✗|
|9||Jay And Silent Bob Strike Back||✓||✗|
|11||Kiki’s Delivery Service||✓||✗|
|12||Whisper of the Heart||✓||✗|
|15||Fat Girl (A ma soeur!)||✓||✗|
|17||Micmacs (Micmacs à tire-larigot)||✓||✗|
|18||A Chorus Line||✓||✗|
|19||This is England||✓||✓|
|21||The Harold Lloyd Comedy Collection||✓||✗|
|22||Old-Time Banjo Styles||✗||✗|
|23||Learning Mountain Dulcimer||✗||✗|
|25||Black Cat, White Cat||✗||✗|
|27||Leningrad Cowboys: Total Balalaika Show||✗||✗|
|28||The Turning Point||✗||✗|
|30||Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam||✗||✗|
The unavailable titles at Zip are ones they know about, and will try to find. Not surprisingly, all of them are also not available from Netflix. The only ones I could watch at Netflix are October Sky and This Is England. And would you credit it, but didn’t the DVD for October Sky just arrive yesterday …
Look, I know it’s early days, but Netflix needs to get a bunch better in the next 30 days. Oh, and it could do with some CanCon – it’s very weak there.
This is what NBC sounds like in Canada. I guess it’s okay to have a message, but no need to get all Yankee Hotel Foxtrot about it. I snipped off the obnoxious taco ads; NBC is so ad-infested that they have to wedge them in their videos.
I was trying to watch a Molly Lewis video, but it failed. Guess they forgot the WW in the web …