Yes, I was very surprised that the DevEBox STM32H7 at 400 MHz was faster than the 500 MHz MIMXRT1011 in the Metro M7. What was even more impressive is that the STM32H7 board was doing all the calculations in double precision, while all the others were working in single.
As for the other boards, the ESP32 variants performed solidly, but the ESP8266 in last place should be retired. The Raspberry Pi Pico 2 W was fairly nippy, but the original Raspberry Pi Pico is still a lowly Cortex-M0+, no matter how fast you clock it. The STM32F4 boards were slower than I expected them to be, frankly. And yay! to the plucky little W600: it comes in second last, but it’s the cheapest thing out there.
All of these benchmarks were made with the same code, but with two lines changed:
The I2C specification, which is a minor syntax change for each board;
The input trigger pin. Some boards like these as numbers, some take them as strings. Pro tip for W600 users: don’t use D0 for an input that’s tied to ground, unless you want the board to go into bootloader mode …
I’d hoped to run these tests on the SAMD21 little micro-controllers (typically 48 MHz Cortex-M0), but they don’t have enough memory for MicroPython’s framebuf module, so it’s omitted from the build. They would likely have been very slow, though.
In the spirit of fairness, I also benchmarked CircuitPython on a Arduino Nano RP2040 Connect, which has the same processor as a Raspberry Pi Pico:
So it’s about 10% quicker than MicroPython, but I had to muck around for ages fighting with CircuitPython’s all-over-the-shop documentation and ninny syntax changes. For those that like that sort of thing, I guess that’s the sort of thing they like.
Yeah, it’s pretty neat to be able to do that on a Commodore VIC-20 with 5K of RAM. But how about a ZX81 with only 1K? With screen memory that moves around depending on how much stuff you have on the screen? No problem:
that’s it: that’s the whole program
The tricky part is printing just enough to the screen that you have enough memory to store the array and still have enough memory for you program. I did that by printing four lines of “🮐” characters (CHR$ 136 on the ZX81, U+1FB90) and moving the cursor down just far enough that later output wouldn’t zap my data. The screen address (given by the D_FILE pointer at 16396) is used as an array of 100 characters.
The ZX81’s (non-ASCII) character set has a nice quirk that Space is CHR$ 0, and inverse video Space (“█”) is at CHR$ 128. So you can use NOT to toggle the value.
Here’s the program listing, with Unicode characters:
10 REM 100DOORS1K SCRUSS 2025
20 FOR I=1 TO 128
30 PRINT "🮐";
40 NEXT I
50 PRINT AT 3,0;"🮐"
60 LET D=PEEK 16396+PEEK 16397*256
70 FOR J=1 TO 100
80 POKE D+J,0
90 NEXT J
100 FOR I=1 TO 100
110 FOR J=I TO 100 STEP I
120 POKE D+J,128*NOT PEEK (D+J)
130 NEXT J
140 NEXT I
150 FOR I=1 TO 100
160 IF PEEK (D+I) THEN PRINT I,
170 NEXT I
The ZX81 program image plus the listing in zmakebas format is included here:
On the left, a Raspberry Pi Pico 2W. On the right, a Raspberry Pi Pico. Each is connected to its own small OLED screen. When a button is pressed, both boards calculate and display the Mandelbrot set, along with its completion time. Needless to say, the Pico 2 W is quite a bit quicker.the before screens …Pico 2 comes in at 10.3 seconds, original Pico at 19.8 seconds
Stuff I found out setting this up:
some old OLEDs, like these surplus pulse oximeter ones, don’t have pull-up resistors on their data lines. These I’ve carefully hidden behind the displays, but they’re there.
Some MicroPython ports don’t include the complex type, so I had to lose the elegant z→z²+C mapping to some ugly code.
Some MicroPython ports don’t have os.uname(), but sys.implementation seems to cover most of the data I need.
On some boards, machine.freq() is an integer value representing the CPU frequency. On others, it’s a list. Aargh.
These displays came from the collection of the late Tom Luff, a Toronto maker who passed away late 2024 after a long illness. Tom had a huge component collection, and my way of remembering him is to show off his stuff being used.
Source:
# benchmark Mandelbrot set (aka Brooks-Matelski set) on OLED
# scruss, 2025-01
# MicroPython
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
from machine import Pin, I2C, idle, reset, freq
# from os import uname
from sys import implementation
from ssd1306 import SSD1306_I2C
from time import ticks_ms, ticks_diff
# %%% These are the only things you should edit %%%
startpin = 16 # pin for trigger configured with external pulldown
# I2C connection for display
i2c = machine.I2C(1, freq=400000, scl=19, sda=18, timeout=50000)
# %%% Stop editing here - I mean it!!!1! %%%
# maps value between istart..istop to range ostart..ostop
def valmap(value, istart, istop, ostart, ostop):
return ostart + (ostop - ostart) * (
(value - istart) / (istop - istart)
)
WIDTH = 128
HEIGHT = 64
TEXTSIZE = 8 # 16x8 text chars
maxit = 120 # DO NOT CHANGE!
# value of 120 gives roughly 10 second run time for Pico 2W
# get some information about the board
# thanks to projectgus for the sys.implementation tip
if type(freq()) is int:
f_mhz = freq() // 1_000_000
else:
# STM32 has freq return a tuple
f_mhz = freq()[0] // 1_000_000
sys_id = (
implementation.name,
".".join([str(x) for x in implementation.version]).rstrip(
"."
), # version
implementation._machine.split()[-1], # processor
"%d MHz" % (f_mhz), # frequency
"%d*%d; %d" % (WIDTH, HEIGHT, maxit), # run parameters
)
p = Pin(startpin, Pin.IN)
# displays I have are yellow/blue, have no pull-up resistors
# and have a confusing I2C address on the silkscreen
oled = SSD1306_I2C(WIDTH, HEIGHT, i2c)
oled.contrast(31)
oled.fill(0)
# display system info
ypos = (HEIGHT - TEXTSIZE * len(sys_id)) // 2
for s in sys_id:
ts = s[: WIDTH // TEXTSIZE]
xpos = (WIDTH - TEXTSIZE * len(ts)) // 2
oled.text(ts, xpos, ypos)
ypos = ypos + TEXTSIZE
oled.show()
while p.value() == 0:
# wait for button press
idle()
oled.fill(0)
oled.show()
start = ticks_ms()
# NB: oled.pixel() is *slow*, so only refresh once per row
for y in range(HEIGHT):
# complex range reversed because display axes wrong way up
cc = valmap(float(y + 1), 1.0, float(HEIGHT), 1.2, -1.2)
for x in range(WIDTH):
cr = valmap(float(x + 1), 1.0, float(WIDTH), -2.8, 2.0)
# can't use complex type as small boards don't have it dammit)
zr = 0.0
zc = 0.0
for k in range(maxit):
t = zr
zr = zr * zr - zc * zc + cr
zc = 2 * t * zc + cc
if zr * zr + zc * zc > 4.0:
oled.pixel(x, y, k % 2) # set pixel if escaped
break
oled.show()
elapsed = ticks_diff(ticks_ms(), start) / 1000
elapsed_str = "%.1f s" % elapsed
# oled.text(" " * len(elapsed_str), 0, HEIGHT - TEXTSIZE)
oled.rect(
0, HEIGHT - TEXTSIZE, TEXTSIZE * len(elapsed_str), TEXTSIZE, 0, True
)
oled.text(elapsed_str, 0, HEIGHT - TEXTSIZE)
oled.show()
# we're done, so clear screen and reset after the button is pressed
while p.value() == 0:
idle()
oled.fill(0)
oled.show()
reset()
Plug in the CH552 board. You may have to do something with the boot/reset button to make it turn up as the right USB ID (4348:55e0 WinChipHead).
Program the board: sudo ch55xisptool basic52s.bin
Disconnect the board, and wire it up to the USB UART (5 V, GND, TX → RXD [P3.0], RX → TXD [P3.1])
Hit return a few times to get a prompt
PWM is on P1.2, INT1 is on P3.3. See Hackaday project to see how to access I²C, and also do things with SFR values using RDSFR / WRSFR. PORT3 is at SFR(0B0H)
please ignore the following for now …
Who wouldn’t want to run a solid BASIC interpreter on a $3 development board? So maybe there are a couple of drawbacks:
there’s no way to save the program to non-volatile storage: you have to be connected through a serial terminal at all times; and
you’ve got about 600 bytes for the whole program, with no way to expand it.
Despite these limitations, there’s some futile fun to be had. I’ll show you how to flash BASIC-52 onto one of these development boards, and give a quick intro to what you can do with it.
BASIC-52
Intel released the first version of BASIC-52 for their 8051 family of microcontrollers in 1984. They produced a chip (8052AH-BASIC) with the interpreter burnt into mask ROM in 1985. The source code was released into the public domain, and various features such as I²C support were added by the community around 2000.
As befits an embedded language, BASIC-52 supports pin management, timers and interrupts. It’s also a fairly full-featured BASIC interpreter with floating point support and mostly familiar keywords and functions. Because it’s designed for very limited memory use, its string handling is quite unlike any other BASIC dialect. It has one character array that you can treat as a string, and a few functions to work with characters, but that’s about all.
Deqing Sun’s CH552 Stick, from the ch55xduino project
You might know WCH (aka QinHeng Electronics) from their inexpensive CH341 USB serial adapters and other interface boards. What you might not realize is that all of their older interface chips are based on an optimized 8051 design
also known as “Monster BASICS Sound reactive RGB+IC Color Flow LED strip”. It’s $5 or so at Dollarama, and includes a USB cable for power and a remote control. It’s two metres long and includes 60 RGB LEDs. Are these really super-cheap NeoPixel clones?
I’m going to keep the USB power so I can power it from a power bank, but otherwise convert it to a string of smart LEDs. We lose the remote control capability.
Pull back the heatshrink at the USB end:
… and there are our connectors. We want to disconnect the blue Din (Data In) line from the built in controller, and solder new wires to Din and GND to run from a microcontroller board.
Maybe not the best solder job, but there are new wires feeding through the heatshrink and soldered onto the strip.
Here’s the heatshrink pushed back, and everything secured with a cable tie.
Now to feed it from standard MicroPython NeoPixel code, suitably jazzed up for 60 pixels.
So you bought that Brother laser printer like everyone told you to. And now it’s out of toner, so you replaced the cartridge. If you were in the USA, you could return the cartridge for free using the included label. But in Canada … it’s a whole deal including registering with Brother and giving away your contact details and, and, and …
Anyway, my dear fellow Canadians, I went through the process and downloaded the label PDF so you don’t have to:
Stewart Russell – scruss.com — 2024-03-26, at age 19999 days …
Summary
One’s thousand day(s) celebration occurs every thousand days of a person’s life. They are meant to be a recognition of getting this far, and are celebrated at the person’s own discretion.
Who is this for?
Maybe your birthday’s on a day associated with an unpleasant event. Your thousand day will never coincide with your birthday.
Maybe your birthday’s in the middle of winter, or in another part of the year that you’re not keen on. Your thousand day is every 2 years and 3 seasons, so it shifts back by a season every time it happens.
Quantities and scale
1000 days is approximately:
2.738 years
2 years 269 days
2 years 8.85 months
2 years, 3 seasons.
4000 days is just shy of 11 years.
Disadvantages
Compared to regular birthdays, thousand days:
must be calculated; they’re not intuitive when they’re going to happen. But we have computers and calendar reminders for that …
can be used to work out your actual date of birth, if someone knows that you’re going to be x000 days old on a particular day. It’s possible to know someone’s birthday, but not know their age.
There are no trademarks, patents, official websites, social media or official anythings attached to this concept. Please take the idea and do good with it.
So why aren’t you implementing this further?
I’ve had this idea kicking around my head for at least the last 20 years. For $REASONS, it turns out I’m not very good at implementing stuff. I’d far rather someone else took this idea and ran with it than let it sit undeveloped.
It’s mid-February in Toronto: -10 °C and snowy. The memory of chirping summer fields is dim. But in my heart there is always a cricket-loud meadow.
Short of moving somewhere warmer, I’m going to have to make my own midwinter crickets. I have micro-controllers and tiny speakers: how hard can this be?
more fun than a bucket of simulated crickets (video description: a plastic box containing three USB power banks, each with USB cable leading to a Raspberry Pi Pico board. Each board has a small electromagnetic speaker attached between ground and a data pin)
I could have merely made these beep away at a fixed rate, but I know that real crickets tend to chirp faster as the day grows warmer. This relationship is frequently referred to as Dolbear’s law. The American inventor Amos Dolbear published his observation (without data or species identification) in The American Naturalist in 1897: The Cricket as a Thermometer —
pretty bold assertions there without data eh, Amos old son …?
When emulating crickets I’m less interested in the rate of chirps per minute, but rather in the period between chirps. I could also care entirely less about barbarian units, so I reformulated it in °C (t) and milliseconds (p):
t = ⅑ × (40 + 75000 ÷ p)
Since I know that the micro-controller has an internal temperature sensor, I’m particularly interested in the inverse relationship:
p = 15000 ÷ (9 * t ÷ 5 – 8)
I can check this against one of Dolbear’s observations for 70°F (= 21⅑ °C, or 190/9) and 120 chirps / minute (= 2 Hz, or a period of 500 ms):
Now I’ve got the timing worked out, how about the chirp sound. From a couple of recordings of cricket meadows I’ve made over the years, I observed:
The total duration of a chirp is about ⅛ s
A chirp is made up of four distinct events:
a quieter short tone;
a longer louder tone of a fractionally higher pitch;
the same longer louder tone repeated;
the first short tone repeated
There is a very short silence between each tone
Each cricket appears to chirp at roughly the same pitch: some slightly lower, some slightly higher
The pitch of the tones is in the range 4500–5000 Hz: around D8 on the music scale
I didn’t attempt to model the actual stridulating mechanism of a particular species of cricket. I made what sounded sort of right to me. Hey, if Amos Dolbear could make stuff up and get it accepted as a “law”, I can at least get away with pulse width modulation and tiny tinny speakers …
This is the profile I came up with:
21 ms of 4568 Hz at 25% duty cycle
7 ms of silence
28 ms of 4824 Hz at 50% duty cycle
7 ms of silence
28 ms of 4824 Hz at 50% duty cycle
7 ms of silence
21 ms of 4568 Hz at 25% duty cycle
7 ms of silence
That’s a total of 126 ms, or ⅛ish seconds. In the code I made each instance play at a randomly-selected relative pitch of ±200 Hz on the above numbers.
For the speaker, I have a bunch of cheap PC motherboard beepers. They have a Dupont header that spans four pins on a Raspberry Pi Pico header, so if you put one on the ground pin at pin 23, the output will be connected to pin 26, aka GPIO 20:
# cricket thermometer simulator - scruss, 2024-02
# uses a buzzer on GPIO 20 to make cricket(ish) noises
# MicroPython - for Raspberry Pi Pico
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
from machine import Pin, PWM, ADC, freq
from time import sleep_ms, ticks_ms, ticks_diff
from random import seed, randrange
freq(125000000) # use default CPU freq
seed() # start with a truly random seed
pwm_out = PWM(Pin(20), freq=10, duty_u16=0) # can't do freq=0
led = Pin("LED", Pin.OUT)
sensor_temp = machine.ADC(4) # adc channel for internal temperature
TOO_COLD = 10.0 # crickets don't chirp below 10 °C (allegedly)
temps = [] # for smoothing out temperature sensor noise
personal_freq_delta = randrange(400) - 199 # different pitch every time
chirp_data = [
# cadence, duty_u16, freq
# there is a cadence=1 silence after each of these
[3, 16384, 4568 + personal_freq_delta],
[4, 32768, 4824 + personal_freq_delta],
[4, 32768, 4824 + personal_freq_delta],
[3, 16384, 4568 + personal_freq_delta],
]
cadence_ms = 7 # length multiplier for playback
def chirp_period_ms(t_c):
# for a given temperature t_c (in °C), returns the
# estimated cricket chirp period in milliseconds.
#
# Based on
# Dolbear, Amos (1897). "The cricket as a thermometer".
# The American Naturalist. 31 (371): 970–971. doi:10.1086/276739
#
# The inverse function is:
# t_c = (75000 / chirp_period_ms + 40) / 9
return int(15000 / (9 * t_c / 5 - 8))
def internal_temperature(temp_adc):
# see pico-micropython-examples / adc / temperature.py
return (
27
- ((temp_adc.read_u16() * (3.3 / (65535))) - 0.706) / 0.001721
)
def chirp(pwm_channel):
for peep in chirp_data:
pwm_channel.freq(peep[2])
pwm_channel.duty_u16(peep[1])
sleep_ms(cadence_ms * peep[0])
# short silence
pwm_channel.duty_u16(0)
pwm_channel.freq(10)
sleep_ms(cadence_ms)
led.value(0) # led off at start; blinks if chirping
### Start: pause a random amount (less than 2 s) before starting
sleep_ms(randrange(2000))
while True:
loop_start_ms = ticks_ms()
sleep_ms(5) # tiny delay to stop the main loop from thrashing
temps.append(internal_temperature(sensor_temp))
if len(temps) > 5:
temps = temps[1:]
avg_temp = sum(temps) / len(temps)
if avg_temp >= TOO_COLD:
led.value(1)
loop_period_ms = chirp_period_ms(avg_temp)
chirp(pwm_out)
led.value(0)
loop_elapsed_ms = ticks_diff(ticks_ms(), loop_start_ms)
sleep_ms(loop_period_ms - loop_elapsed_ms)
There are a few more details in the code that I haven’t covered here:
The program pauses for a short random time on starting. This is to ensure that if you power up a bunch of these at the same time, they don’t start exactly synchronized
The Raspberry Pi Pico’s temperature sensor can be slightly noisy, so the chirping frequency is based on the average of (up to) the last five readings
There’s no chirping below 10 °C, because Amos Dolbear said so
The built-in LED also flashes if the board is chirping. It doesn’t mimic the speaker’s PWM cadence, though.
Before I show you the next video, I need to say: no real crickets were harmed in the making of this post. I took the bucket outside (roughly -5 °C) and the “crickets” stopped chirping as they cooled down. Don’t worry, they started back up chirping again when I took them inside.
“If You’re Cold They’re Cold, Bring Them Inside” (video description: a plastic box containing three USB power banks, each with USB cable leading to a Raspberry Pi Pico board. Each board has a small electromagnetic speaker attached between ground and a data pin)
First PostScript font: STSong (华文宋体) was released in 1991, making it the first PostScript font by a Chinese foundry [ref: Typekit blog — Pan-CJK Partner Profile: SinoType]. But STSong looks like Garamond(ish).
This is a mini celebratory post to say that I’ve fixed the database encoding problems on this blog. It looks like I will have to go through the posts manually to correct the errors still, but at least I can enter, store and display UTF-8 characters as expected.
“? µ ° × — – ½ ¾ £ é?êè”, he said with some relief.
Postmortem: For reasons I cannot explain or remember, the database on this blog flipped to an archaic character set: latin1, aka ISO/IEC 8859-1. A partial fix was effected by downloading the entire site’s database backup, and changing all the following references in the SQL:
For additional annoyance, the entire SQL dump was too big to load back into phpmyadmin, so I had to split it by table. Thank goodness for awk!
#!/usr/bin/awk -f
BEGIN {
outfile = "nothing.sql";
}
/^# Table: / {
# very special comment in WP backup that introduces a new table
# last field is table_name,
# which we use to create table_name.sql
t = $NF
gsub(/`/, "", t);
outfile = t ".sql";
}
{
print > outfile;
}
The data still appears to be confused. For example, in the post Compose yourself, Raspberry Pi!, what should appear as “That little key marked “Compose”” appears as “That little key marked “Composeâ€Â”. This isn’t a straight conversion of one character set to another. It appears to have been double-encoded, and wrongly too.
Still, at least I can now write again and have whatever new things I make turn up the way I like. Editing 20 years of blog posts awaits … zzz
My OpenProcessing demo “autumn in canada”, redone as a NAPLPS playback file. Yes, it would have been nice to have outlined leaves, but I’ve only got four colours to play with that are vaguely autumnal in NAPLPS’s limited 2-bit RGB.
NAPLPS — an almost-forgotten videotex vector graphics format with a regrettable pronunciation (/nap-lips/, no really) — was really hard to create. Back in the early days when it was a worthwhile Canadian initiative called Telidon (see Inter/Access’s exhibit Remember Tomorrow: A Telidon Story) it required a custom video workstation costing $$$$$$. It got cheaper by the time the 1990s rolled round, but it was never easy and so interest waned.
I don’t claim what I made is particularly interesting:
suspiciously canadian
but even decoding the tutorial and standards material was hard. NAPLPS made heavy use of bitfields interleaved and packed into 7 and 8-bit characters. It was kind of a clever idea (lower resolution data could be packed into fewer bytes) but the implementation is quite unpleasant.
A few of the references/tools/resources I relied on:
The 1983 BYTE Magazine article series NAPLPS: A New Standard for Text and Graphics. Also long and needlessly wordy, with digressions into extensions that were never implemented. Contains a commented byte dump of an image that explains most concepts by example
John Durno has spent years recovering Telidon / NAPLPS works. He has published many useful resources on the subject
Here’s the fragment of code I wrote to generate the NAPLPS:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
# draw a disappointing maple leaf in NAPLPS - scruss, 2023-09
# stylized maple leaf polygon, quite similar to
# the coordinates used in the Canadian flag ...
maple = [
[62, 2],
[62, 35],
[94, 31],
[91, 41],
[122, 66],
[113, 70],
[119, 90],
[100, 86],
[97, 96],
[77, 74],
[85, 114],
[73, 108],
[62, 130],
[51, 108],
[39, 114],
[47, 74],
[27, 96],
[24, 86],
[5, 90],
[11, 70],
[2, 66],
[33, 41],
[30, 31],
[62, 35],
]
def colour(r, g, b):
# r, g and b are limited to the range 0-3
return chr(0o74) + chr(
64
+ ((g & 2) << 4)
+ ((r & 2) << 3)
+ ((b & 2) << 2)
+ ((g & 1) << 2)
+ ((r & 1) << 1)
+ (b & 1)
)
def coord(x, y):
# if you stick with 256 x 192 integer coordinates this should be okay
xsign = 0
ysign = 0
if x < 0:
xsign = 1
x = x * -1
x = ((x ^ 255) + 1) & 255
if y < 0:
ysign = 1
y = y * -1
y = ((y ^ 255) + 1) & 255
return (
chr(
64
+ (xsign << 5)
+ ((x & 0xC0) >> 3)
+ (ysign << 2)
+ ((y & 0xC0) >> 6)
)
+ chr(64 + ((x & 0x38)) + ((y & 0x38) >> 3))
+ chr(64 + ((x & 7) << 3) + (y & 7))
)
f = open("maple.nap", "w")
f.write(chr(0x18) + chr(0x1B)) # preamble
f.write(chr(0o16)) # SO: into graphics mode
f.write(colour(0, 0, 0)) # black
f.write(chr(0o40) + chr(0o120)) # clear screen to current colour
f.write(colour(3, 0, 0)) # red
# *** STALK ***
f.write(
chr(0o44) + coord(maple[0][0], maple[0][1])
) # point set absolute
f.write(
chr(0o51)
+ coord(maple[1][0] - maple[0][0], maple[1][1] - maple[0][1])
) # line relative
# *** LEAF ***
f.write(
chr(0o67) + coord(maple[1][0], maple[1][1])
) # set polygon filled
# append all the relative leaf vertices
for i in range(2, len(maple)):
f.write(
coord(
maple[i][0] - maple[i - 1][0], maple[i][1] - maple[i - 1][1]
)
)
f.write(chr(0x0F) + chr(0x1A)) # postamble
f.close()
There are a couple of perhaps useful routines in there:
colour(r, g, b) spits out the code for two bits per component RGB. Inputs are limited to the range 0–3 without error checking
coord(x, y) converts integer coordinates to a NAPLPS output stream. Best limited to a 256 × 192 size. Will also work with positive/negative relative coordinates.
After remarkable success with the SYN-6988 TTS module, then somewhat less success with the SYN-6658 and other modules, I didn’t hold out much hope for the YuTone SYN-6288, which – while boasting a load of background tunes that could play over speech – can only convert Chinese text to speech
The wiring is similar to the SYN-6988: a serial UART connection at 9600 baud, plus a Busy (BY) line to signal when the chip is busy. The serial protocol is slightly more complicated, as the SYN-6288 requires a checksum byte at the end.
As I’m not interested in the text-to-speech output itself, here’s a MicroPython script to play all of the sounds:
# very crude MicroPython demo of SYN6288 TTS chip
# scruss, 2023-07
import machine
import time
### setup device
ser = machine.UART(
0, baudrate=9600, bits=8, parity=None, stop=1
) # tx=Pin(0), rx=Pin(1)
busyPin = machine.Pin(2, machine.Pin.IN, machine.Pin.PULL_UP)
def sendspeak(u2, data, busy):
# modified from https://github.com/TPYBoard/TPYBoard_lib/
# u2 = UART(uart, baud)
eec = 0
buf = [0xFD, 0x00, 0, 0x01, 0x01]
# buf = [0xFD, 0x00, 0, 0x01, 0x79] # plays with bg music 15
buf[2] = len(data) + 3
buf += list(bytearray(data, "utf-8"))
for i in range(len(buf)):
eec ^= int(buf[i])
buf.append(eec)
u2.write(bytearray(buf))
while busy.value() != True:
# wait for busy line to go high
time.sleep_ms(5)
while busy.value() == True:
# wait for it to finish
time.sleep_ms(5)
for s in "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxy":
playstr = "[v10][x1]sound" + s
print(playstr)
sendspeak(ser, playstr, busyPin)
time.sleep(2)
for s in "abcdefgh":
playstr = "[v10][x1]msg" + s
print(playstr)
sendspeak(ser, playstr, busyPin)
time.sleep(2)
for s in "abcdefghijklmno":
playstr = "[v10][x1]ring" + s
print(playstr)
sendspeak(ser, playstr, busyPin)
time.sleep(2)
Each sound starts and stops with a very loud click, and the sound quality is not great. I couldn’t get a good recording of the sounds (some of which of which are over a minute long) as the only way I could get reliable audio output was through tiny headphones. Any recording came out hopelessly distorted:
I’m not too disappointed that this didn’t work well. I now know that the SYN-6988 is the good one to get. It also looks like I may never get to try the XFS5152CE speech synthesizer board: AliExpress has cancelled my shipment for no reason. It’s supposed to have some English TTS function, even if quite limited.
Here’s the auto-translated SYN-6288 manual, if you do end up finding a use for the thing
Yup, it’s another “let’s wire up a SYN6988 board” thing, this time for MMBasic running on the Armmite STM32F407 Module (aka ‘Armmite F4’). This board is also known as the BLACK_F407VE, which also makes a nice little MicroPython platform.
Uh, let’s not dwell too much on how the SYN6988 seems to parse 19:51 as “91 minutes to 20” …
Wiring
SYN6988
Armmite F4
RX
PA09 (COM1 TX)
TX
PA10 (COM1 RX)
RDY
PA08
your choice of 3.3 V and GND connections, of course
Yes, I know it says it’s an XFS5152, but I got a SYN6988 and it seems to be about as reliable a source as one can find. The board is marked YS-V6E-V1.03, and even mentions SYN6988 on the rear silkscreen:
Code
REM SYN6988 speech demo - MMBasic / Armmite F4
REM scruss, 2023-07
OPEN "COM1:9600" AS #5
REM READY line on PA8
SETPIN PA8, DIN, PULLUP
REM you can ignore font/text commands
CLS
FONT 1
TEXT 0,15,"[v1]Hello - this is a speech demo."
say("[v1]Hello - this is a speech demo.")
TEXT 0,30,"[x1]soundy[d]"
say("[x1]soundy[d]"): REM chimes
TEXT 0,45,"The time is "+LEFT$(TIME$,5)+"."
say("The time is "+LEFT$(TIME$,5)+".")
END
SUB say(a$)
LOCAL dl%,maxlof%
REM data length is text length + 2 (for the 1 and 0 bytes)
dl%=2+LEN(a$)
maxlof%=LOF(#5)
REM SYN6988 simple data packet
REM byte 1 : &HFD
REM byte 2 : data length (high byte)
REM byte 3 : data length (low byte)
REM byte 4 : &H01
REM byte 5 : &H00
REM bytes 6-: ASCII string data
PRINT #5, CHR$(&hFD)+CHR$(dl%\256)+CHR$(dl% MOD 256)+CHR$(1)+CHR$(0)+a$;
DO WHILE LOF(#5)<maxlof%
REM pause while sending text
PAUSE 5
LOOP
DO WHILE PIN(PA8)<>1
REM wait until RDY is high
PAUSE 5
LOOP
DO WHILE PIN(PA8)<>0
REM wait until SYN6988 signals READY
PAUSE 5
LOOP
END SUB
The other week’s success with the SYN6988 TTS chip was not repeated with three other modules I ordered, alas. Two of them I couldn’t get a peep out of, the other didn’t support English text-to-speech.
SYN6658
This one looks remarkably like the SYN6988:
Yes, I added the 6658 label so I could tell the boards apart
Apart from the main chip, the only difference appears to be that the board’s silkscreen says YS-V6 V1.15 where the SYN6988’s said YS-V6E V1.02.
To be fair to YuTone (the manufacturer), they claim this only supports Chinese as an input language. If you feed it English, at best you’ll get it spelling out the letters. It does have quite a few amusing sounds, though, so at least you can make it beep and chime. My MicroPython library for the VoiceTX SYN6988 text to speech module can drive it as far as I understand it.
I’ve still got a SYN6288 to look at, plus a XFS5152CE TTSthat’s in the mail that may or may not be in the mail. The SYN6988 is the best of the bunch so far.
I have a bunch of other boards on order to see if the other chips (SYN6288, SYN6658, XF5152) work in the same way. I really wonder which I’ll end up receiving!
Update (2023-07-09): Got the SYN6658. It does not support English TTS and thus is not recommended. It does have some cool sounds, though.
Embedded Text Command Sound Table
The github repo references Embedded text commands, but all of the sound references were too difficult to paste into a table there. So here are all of the ones that the SYN-6988 knows about:
Name is the string you use to play the sound, eg: [x1]sound101
Alias is an alternative name by which you can call some of the sounds. This is for better compatibility with the SYN6288 apparently. So [x1]sound101 is exactly the same as specifying [x1]sounda
Type is the sound description from the manual. Many of these are blank
Link is a playable link for a recording of the sound.
![A table of the latin characters @, A-Z, [, \, ], ^, _, `, a-z and { in STSong half-width latin, taken from fontforge](https://scruss.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Screenshot-from-2024-01-07-11-44-09.png)
