All benchmarks are artificial, but this one had me scratching my head. One hears that the BeagleBone Black is screamingly fast compared to the Raspberry Pi; faster, newer processor, blahdeblah, mcbtyc, etc. I found the opposite is true.
g++ -Ofast card.cpp -o card
and then ran it with:
time ./card > /dev/null
The results are … surprising:
- Raspberry Pi: 4′ 15″
- BeagleBone Black: 12′ 39″ → 3× slower
(In comparison, my i7 quad-core laptop runs it in 8½ seconds.)
I don’t have any explanation why the BBB is so much slower. It’s almost as if the compiler isn’t fully optimizing under Ångström Linux.
Raspberry Pi: system info
$ uname -a Linux rpi 3.6.11+ #538 PREEMPT Fri Aug 30 20:42:08 BST 2013 armv6l GNU/Linux $ cat /proc/cpuinfo Processor : ARMv6-compatible processor rev 7 (v6l) BogoMIPS : 697.95 Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp java tls CPU implementer : 0x41 CPU architecture: 7 CPU variant : 0x0 CPU part : 0xb76 CPU revision : 7 Hardware : BCM2708 Revision : 000f
BeagleBone Black: system info
# uname -a Linux beaglebone 3.8.13 #1 SMP Tue Jun 18 02:11:09 EDT 2013 armv7l GNU/Linux # cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l) BogoMIPS : 297.40 Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee neon vfpv3 tls CPU implementer : 0x41 CPU architecture: 7 CPU variant : 0x3 CPU part : 0xc08 CPU revision : 2 Hardware : Generic AM33XX (Flattened Device Tree) Revision : 0000
Both boards are running at stock speed.