Category: goatee-stroking musing, or something

  • my juvenalia: 2D Star Dodge / Stardodger

    Oh dear:

    And here’s the Locomotive BASIC version, as published in Amstrad Computer User:

    10 ' ** Initialise **
    20 MODE 1
    30 INK 0,0
    40 BORDER 0
    50 INK 1,26
    60 INK 3,0
    70 q=5
    90 LOCATE 16,1
    100 PRINT"Stardodger"
    110 LOCATE 1,5
    120 PRINT"Avoid the killer Asterisqs, and seek the"
    130 LOCATE 9,6
    140 PRINT"wondrous Nextscreen Gap."
    150 LOCATE 12,13
    160 PRINT"Use SHIFT to climb"
    170 GOSUB 700
    190 MODE 1
    200 DRAWR 629,0
    210 DRAWR 0,170
    220 MOVER 0,60
    230 DRAWR 0,169
    240 DRAWR -629,0
    250 DRAWR 0,-399
    260 DRAWR 0,2
    270 DRAWR 627,0
    280 DRAWR 0,168
    290 MOVER 0,60
    300 DRAWR 0,167
    310 DRAWR -625,0
    320 DRAWR 0,-399
    330 MOVE 636,0
    340 DRAW 636,399,3
    350 MOVE 638,0
    360 DRAW 638,399
    370 PLOT -1,-1,1
    380 TAG
    390 FOR s=1 TO q
    400 MOVE 50+RND*561,20+RND*361
    410 PRINT"*";
    420 NEXT
    430 TAGOFF
    440 MOVE 0,200
    450 dy=4
    470 DRAWR 4,dy
    480 IF INKEY(21)<>-1 THEN dy=4 ELSE dy=-4
    490 t=TESTR(2,dy/2)
    500 IF t=1 GOTO 550  
    510 IF t=3 GOTO 620
    520 MOVER -2,-dy/2
    530 GOTO 470
    550 MODE 1
    560 PRINT TAB(16);"YOU GOOFED"
    570 LOCATE 5,13
    580 PRINT"Number of Screens completed = "+STR$((q/5)-1)
    590 GOSUB 700
    600 RUN
    620 MODE 1 
    630 PRINT TAB(16);"WELL DONE"
    640 LOCATE 10,13
    650 PRINT"Stand by for Screen "+STR$((q/5)+1)
    660 GOSUB 700
    670 q=q+5
    680 GOTO 190
    700 LOCATE 8,25
    710 PRINT"Press any key to continue"
    720 WHILE INKEY$<>""
    730 WEND
    740 WHILE INKEY$=""
    750 WEND
    760 RETURN
    

    Here’s Asterisk Tracker, the original inspiration from 1984

  • implicit markup: easy to read, hard to parse

    I don’t usually ponder about other people’s blog postings, but Jeff Atwood’s Responsible Open Source Code Parenting reminded me of some of the old wars that the used to be when I was a markup head. Jeff writes about his frustration that John Gruber’s Markdown text-to-html filter:

    1. hasn’t been updated for some time
    2. doesn’t quite do exactly what Jeff’s users at Stack Overflow want
    3. appears to have any changes in its behaviour from v1.0.1 strenuously vetoed by Gruber himself.

    Markdown is nice in that you can write screeds of text, and it does almost exactly what you’d expect. The markup doesn’t get in the way, usually. The difficulty arises when implicit markup (indented lines for quoted text, bulleted lists, highlights) has to give way to explicit (cross-references, code samples). Explicit markup is ugly, but sometimes, you’ve got to do it. Complex intent requires complex modes of communication, and sometimes plain text just hasn’t the bandwidth. [As an aside, there was a hilarious lengthy recurring episode on John Mark Ockerbloom‘s late bookpeople mailing list where a user (mercilessly skewered here)  insisted that they could write a general Gutenberg plain-text converter that would re-create typeset quality in an e-book reader with no explicit markup, and that XML was completely unnecessary and ill-conceived. The un-markup language, called zen markup language (said user had an aversion to the shift key) lives on only in a single website: the home of z.m.l. As for XML, its executive assistant had no comment on the matter.] Looking at Markdown, it looks like Gruber’s moved on from it. He made a 1.0.1 which did what he wanted. The code’s there to change if anyone needs it. I understand his frustration at people wanting to make changes and still call it Markdown; I’d be annoyed if I had text which I thought was in one format suddenly not be accepted, or do something unexpected. Seriously, that’s almost as bad as ‘deprecated‘. [At least Gruber didn’t go on a deletion rampage, like (admittedly smaller-time) erstwhile CHDK stalwart Barney Fife did when he was slighted in a forum. Looks like almost everything he contributed to CHDK has been removed, including some very useful control scripts and explanations.] Personally, when I need to make text to web conversions, I still use txt2html and a bunch of shell and Perl glue to feed to tidy. It’s on its third maintainer, doesn’t do much, but does it simply. And I’m pretty simple that way.

    Update: see also On my increasing exasperation with Markdown.

  • oh dear …

    At the meeting Van Zyl agreed to turn off the tower with immediate effect to assess whether the health problems described by some of the residents subsided. What Craigavon residents were unaware of is that the tower had already been switched off in early October – six weeks before the November meeting where residents confirmed the continued ailments they experienced.

    via Massive revelation in iBurst tower battle.

  • wwdbd?

    Q: What would David Byrne do?
    A: Be David Byrne.

  • to scan film, or not

    I’ve recently taken up film photography again. But processing is expensive.

    To have 24 exposures processed and scanned at 6MP at Downtown Camera costs $12 + tax. That’s a pretty good price for black and white.

    I can process at home (yay stinky toxic chemicals!) for a bit less. I’d need to buy a scanner, and the cheapest film scanners come in at around $300.

    What to do, what to do?

  • Unstable airline passenger ignites self; none hurt

    I try very hard not to write about the news; it affects me so little, yet frequently annoys me.

    All that media noise about that guy on that plane. So much passenger delay will ensue.

    Of course he was unstable. Killing yourself and others for a cause is not rational.

    Of course he’d claim connections to Al Qaeda. He’s unstable, wants to sound badass.

    Of course Al Qaeda would claim him as one of their own. What, would you turn down the free publicity?

    So, the subject of this entry is how I think it should have been reported. Move on, people; there’s real news to be reported.

  • eggs are not the only nog

    Why is eggnog the only nog? Why isn’t there meatnog, since it’s just as revolting a concept. Now I’ve written this, is it a nogblog?

  • tammy’s scary hair

    circa 1969, on Hee Haw:

  • just think

    just think if i were famous i could draw stuff like this and sell it for thousands of dollars but when i do it it's just a doodle worth nothing
    just think if i were famous i could draw stuff like this and sell it for thousands of dollars but when i do it it’s just a doodle worth nothing
  • dropping nuclear reactors from a great height

    This looks like the engineers had far too much fun trying to find ways of damaging a small (simulated) nuclear reactor: SNAP rector safety tests

  • it is of course part of some colossal oilpatch conspiracy

    I was in Edmonton this week, so I picked up a copy of Vue Weekly purely to have some real, hold-it-in-your-hands Bob the Angry Flower. And this is what it was:

    floop-as_printedBut I go online and find the web version:

    floopand I’m left asking, “But WHY???”