<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steelwinds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scruss.com/blog/2007/06/24/steelwinds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scruss.com/blog/2007/06/24/steelwinds/</link>
	<description>"I want to be a loony ... it's quite an important thing" - Graham Chapman</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scruss</title>
		<link>http://scruss.com/blog/2007/06/24/steelwinds/comment-page-1/#comment-48695</link>
		<dc:creator>scruss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scruss.com/blog/2007/06/24/steelwinds/#comment-48695</guid>
		<description>They're slow only because they're big. Big or small, turbine blade tips have about the same linear velocity, so the longer the blade, the less the rotational speed (since v = rω).

These turbines are about 96-100m in diameter. The first ones I worked with were about ⅓ of that, and the (quarter century old!) one on Fair Isle is about ⅙.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-39e9203943c28eb09e49ddfabd32604466ddf22a'>They&#8217;re slow only because they&#8217;re big. Big or small, turbine blade tips have about the same linear velocity, so the longer the blade, the less the rotational speed (since v = rω).</p>
<p>These turbines are about 96-100m in diameter. The first ones I worked with were about ⅓ of that, and the (quarter century old!) one on Fair Isle is about ⅙.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Scovell</title>
		<link>http://scruss.com/blog/2007/06/24/steelwinds/comment-page-1/#comment-48673</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Scovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scruss.com/blog/2007/06/24/steelwinds/#comment-48673</guid>
		<description>Excuse my ignorance, but is slow turning good? I'm assuming it indicates efficiency, right? 

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-d0659345ef6f827426e24d084065d4d4ed59d352'>Excuse my ignorance, but is slow turning good? I&#8217;m assuming it indicates efficiency, right? </p>
<p>Rob</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
